FileBrowser Quantum vs Papra
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
Papra
Minimalistic self-hosted document archiving platform
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Papra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | E-books & Media Library |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 5,160 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Evernote, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Papra better?
Neither is universally better. FileBrowser Quantum has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Papra free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Papra under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Papra with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Papra: yes.