FileBrowser Quantum vs OpenCloud Files
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
OpenCloud Files
Lightweight self-hosted file sync and sharing platform
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | OpenCloud Files |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 2,083 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose OpenCloud Files if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or OpenCloud Files better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenCloud Files if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and OpenCloud Files free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenCloud Files under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and OpenCloud Files with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. OpenCloud Files: yes.