FileBrowser Quantum vs LocalSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFileBrowser QuantumLocalSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoDart
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 7,695★ 87,025
First released20242022
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or LocalSend better?

Neither is universally better. LocalSend has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and LocalSend free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LocalSend under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and LocalSend with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. LocalSend: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons