SHSelfHostIndex

FileBrowser Quantum vs h5ai

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FI FileBrowser Quantum Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features VS H5 h5ai Modern HTTP web server index for browsing files
FeatureFileBrowser Quantumh5ai
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 7,695★ 6,052
First released20242012
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxGoogle Drive

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose h5ai if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
h5ai details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or h5ai better?

Neither is universally better. FileBrowser Quantum has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and h5ai free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and h5ai under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and h5ai with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. h5ai: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons