Feber vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeberSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM50 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 87,439
First released20242014
ReplacesDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Feber if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Feber details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feber or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Feber and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Feber is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feber and Syncthing with Docker?

Feber: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons