Feber vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeberFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM50 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,800
First released20242017
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Feber if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Feber details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feber or File Browser better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Feber and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Feber is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feber and File Browser with Docker?

Feber: check the project docs for container support. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons