Feber vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeberSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 38,732
First released20242022
ReplacesGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Feber if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Feber details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feber or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while Feber is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Feber and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. Feber is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feber and Spacedrive with Docker?

Feber: check the project docs for container support. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons