FastChat vs LM Studio

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFastChatLM Studio
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersLocal LLM Runners
LicenseApache-2.0Proprietary
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM8,192 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,516★ 5,000
First released20232023
ReplacesOpenAI APIChatGPT

Why pick each one

Choose FastChat if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
FastChat details

Choose LM Studio if…

  • Released under the Proprietary license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 5k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
LM Studio details

Frequently asked questions

Is FastChat or LM Studio better?

Neither is universally better. FastChat has the larger community, while LM Studio is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FastChat and LM Studio free and open-source?

Yes. FastChat is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LM Studio under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FastChat and LM Studio with Docker?

FastChat: yes. LM Studio: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons