Enchanted vs LM Studio

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnchantedLM Studio
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersLocal LLM Runners
LicenseApache-2.0Proprietary
LanguageSwiftTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,983★ 5,000
First released20242023
ReplacesChatGPTChatGPT

Why pick each one

Choose Enchanted if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Swift
Enchanted details

Choose LM Studio if…

  • Released under the Proprietary license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 5k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
LM Studio details

Frequently asked questions

Is Enchanted or LM Studio better?

Neither is universally better. Enchanted has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Enchanted and LM Studio free and open-source?

Yes. Enchanted is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LM Studio under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Enchanted and LM Studio with Docker?

Enchanted: check the project docs for container support. LM Studio: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons