Continue vs LM Studio

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureContinueLM Studio
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersLocal LLM Runners
LicenseApache-2.0Proprietary
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,374★ 5,000
First released20232023
ReplacesGitHub Copilot, CursorChatGPT

Why pick each one

Choose Continue if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 35.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Continue details

Choose LM Studio if…

  • Released under the Proprietary license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 5k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
LM Studio details

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or LM Studio better?

Neither is universally better. Continue has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Continue and LM Studio free and open-source?

Yes. Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LM Studio under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Continue and LM Studio with Docker?

Continue: check the project docs for container support. LM Studio: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons