Fail2Ban Webinterface vs Grafana Loki
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fail2Ban Webinterface
Monitor Fail2Ban and manually ban / release IP's
VS
Grafana Loki
Log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus
| Feature | Fail2Ban Webinterface | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0-or-later | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7 | ★ 28,687 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | — | Splunk, Datadog Logs |
Why pick each one
Choose Fail2Ban Webinterface if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Grafana Loki if…
- Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
- Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Frequently asked questions
Is Fail2Ban Webinterface or Grafana Loki better?
Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Fail2Ban Webinterface is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Fail2Ban Webinterface and Grafana Loki free and open-source?
Yes. Fail2Ban Webinterface is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fail2Ban Webinterface and Grafana Loki with Docker?
Fail2Ban Webinterface: check the project docs for container support. Grafana Loki: yes.