Fail2Ban Webinterface vs Glances

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFail2Ban WebinterfaceGlances
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-laterLGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM50 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 7★ 33,269
First released20242012
ReplacesDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Fail2Ban Webinterface if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Fail2Ban Webinterface details

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fail2Ban Webinterface or Glances better?

Neither is universally better. Glances has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Fail2Ban Webinterface and Glances free and open-source?

Yes. Fail2Ban Webinterface is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Glances under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fail2Ban Webinterface and Glances with Docker?

Fail2Ban Webinterface: check the project docs for container support. Glances: yes.

Related comparisons