Fab-manager vs Plane

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFab-managerPlane
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-laterAGPL-3.0
LanguageRubyTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 254★ 55,704
First released20232023
ReplacesJira, Linear, Asana

Why pick each one

Choose Fab-manager if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Ruby
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Fab-manager details

Choose Plane if…

  • Polished modern interface
  • Good for product teams
  • Active development
Plane details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fab-manager or Plane better?

Neither is universally better. Plane has the larger community, while Fab-manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Fab-manager and Plane free and open-source?

Yes. Fab-manager is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Plane under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fab-manager and Plane with Docker?

Fab-manager: check the project docs for container support. Plane: yes.

Related comparisons