SHSelfHostIndex

Fab-manager vs git-bug

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FA Fab-manager Fab Lab management solution VS GI git-bug Distributed bug tracker embedded directly in Git
FeatureFab-managergit-bug
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-laterGPL-3.0
LanguageRubyGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 254★ 9,968
First released20232018
Replaces—Jira, GitHub Issues

Why pick each one

Choose Fab-manager if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Ruby
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Fab-manager details

Choose git-bug if…

  • No separate server needed
  • Issues travel with code
git-bug details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fab-manager or git-bug better?

Neither is universally better. git-bug has the larger community, while Fab-manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Fab-manager and git-bug free and open-source?

Yes. Fab-manager is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and git-bug under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fab-manager and git-bug with Docker?

Fab-manager: check the project docs for container support. git-bug: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons