Fab-manager vs Habitica Self-Hosted

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFab-managerHabitica Self-Hosted
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-laterGPL-3.0
LanguageRubyJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM50 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 254★ 14,044
First released20232013
ReplacesTodoist, Habitica

Why pick each one

Choose Fab-manager if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Ruby
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Fab-manager details

Choose Habitica Self-Hosted if…

  • Motivating gameplay
  • Active community
Habitica Self-Hosted details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fab-manager or Habitica Self-Hosted better?

Neither is universally better. Habitica Self-Hosted has the larger community, while Fab-manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Fab-manager and Habitica Self-Hosted free and open-source?

Yes. Fab-manager is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Habitica Self-Hosted under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fab-manager and Habitica Self-Hosted with Docker?

Fab-manager: check the project docs for container support. Habitica Self-Hosted: yes.

Related comparisons