exifr vs Hydrus Network
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
exifr
Fast JavaScript EXIF and metadata reader for photos
VS
Hydrus Network
Self-hosted tag-based media organizer and image database
| Feature | exifr | Hydrus Network |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | WTFPL |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,245 | ★ 3,148 |
| First released | 2019 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Commercial metadata APIs | Google Photos, Eagle |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is exifr or Hydrus Network better?
Neither is universally better. Hydrus Network has the larger community, while exifr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are exifr and Hydrus Network free and open-source?
Yes. exifr is licensed under MIT and Hydrus Network under WTFPL. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run exifr and Hydrus Network with Docker?
exifr: check the project docs for container support. Hydrus Network: check the project docs for container support.