darktable vs Hydrus Network
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
darktable
Open-source photography workflow and RAW developer
VS
Hydrus Network
Self-hosted tag-based media organizer and image database
| Feature | darktable | Hydrus Network |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | WTFPL |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, snap | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,904 | ★ 3,148 |
| First released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Adobe Lightroom | Google Photos, Eagle |
Why pick each one
Choose darktable if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 12.9k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is darktable or Hydrus Network better?
darktable is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Hydrus Network if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are darktable and Hydrus Network free and open-source?
Yes. darktable is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Hydrus Network under WTFPL. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run darktable and Hydrus Network with Docker?
darktable: check the project docs for container support. Hydrus Network: check the project docs for container support.