exifr vs gallery-dl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
exifr
Fast JavaScript EXIF and metadata reader for photos
VS
gallery-dl
Command-line tool to download image galleries from websites
| Feature | exifr | gallery-dl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,245 | ★ 19,143 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Commercial metadata APIs | Manual downloads |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is exifr or gallery-dl better?
Neither is universally better. gallery-dl has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are exifr and gallery-dl free and open-source?
Yes. exifr is licensed under MIT and gallery-dl under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run exifr and gallery-dl with Docker?
exifr: check the project docs for container support. gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support.