ExifCleaner vs exifr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureExifCleanerexifr
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePerlJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 2,552★ 1,245
First released20192019
ReplacesOnline metadata removersCommercial metadata APIs

Why pick each one

Choose ExifCleaner if…

  • Simple to use
  • Works offline
ExifCleaner details

Choose exifr if…

  • Comprehensive metadata support
  • Excellent performance
exifr details

Frequently asked questions

Is ExifCleaner or exifr better?

Neither is universally better. ExifCleaner has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are ExifCleaner and exifr free and open-source?

Yes. ExifCleaner is licensed under MIT and exifr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ExifCleaner and exifr with Docker?

ExifCleaner: check the project docs for container support. exifr: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons