Corteza vs Fat Free CRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Corteza
Low-code platform with built-in CRM and case management
VS
Fat Free CRM
Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
| Feature | Corteza | Fat Free CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,125 | ★ 3,628 |
| First released | 2019 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, Microsoft Power Apps | Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Corteza if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
Choose Fat Free CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Corteza or Fat Free CRM better?
Fat Free CRM is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Corteza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Corteza and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?
Yes. Corteza is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Corteza and Fat Free CRM with Docker?
Corteza: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.