Errbit vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureErrbitApache SkyWalking
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageRubyJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 4,270★ 24,915
First released20112015
ReplacesAirbrake, SentryNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Errbit if…

  • Long-established and stable
  • Integrates with many trackers
Errbit details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is Errbit or Apache SkyWalking better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Errbit is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Errbit and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. Errbit is licensed under MIT and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Errbit and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

Errbit: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons