Ente Photos vs nanogallery2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ente Photos
End-to-end encrypted photo storage and backup
VS
nanogallery2
JavaScript photo and video gallery library you host yourself
| Feature | Ente Photos | nanogallery2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Dart | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,201 | ★ 791 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, iCloud Photos | Flickr, SmugMug |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ente Photos or nanogallery2 better?
Neither is universally better. Ente Photos has the larger community, while nanogallery2 is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Ente Photos and nanogallery2 free and open-source?
Yes. Ente Photos is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and nanogallery2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ente Photos and nanogallery2 with Docker?
Ente Photos: yes. nanogallery2: check the project docs for container support.