Coppermine vs Ente Photos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Coppermine
Multi-purpose, full-featured web picture gallery
VS
Ente Photos
End-to-end encrypted photo storage and backup
| Feature | Coppermine | Ente Photos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Dart |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 73 | ★ 28,201 |
| First released | 2002 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Flickr | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Coppermine or Ente Photos better?
Neither is universally better. Ente Photos has the larger community, while Coppermine is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Coppermine and Ente Photos free and open-source?
Yes. Coppermine is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Ente Photos under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Coppermine and Ente Photos with Docker?
Coppermine: check the project docs for container support. Ente Photos: yes.