Enchanted vs Page Assist
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Enchanted
Native Ollama client for iOS and macOS
VS
Page Assist
Browser extension to use local AI models on the web
| Feature | Enchanted | Page Assist |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Local LLM Runners | Local LLM Runners |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Swift | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,983 | ★ 8,125 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | ChatGPT | ChatGPT |
Why pick each one
Choose Enchanted if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in Swift
Choose Page Assist if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Enchanted or Page Assist better?
Neither is universally better. Page Assist has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Enchanted and Page Assist free and open-source?
Yes. Enchanted is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Page Assist under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Enchanted and Page Assist with Docker?
Enchanted: check the project docs for container support. Page Assist: check the project docs for container support.