Stalwart Mail Server vs parsedmarc
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
VS
parsedmarc
Parser and dashboard for DMARC aggregate reports
| Feature | Stalwart Mail Server | parsedmarc |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,059 | ★ 1,275 |
| First released | 2020 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace | Dmarcian, Valimail |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Choose parsedmarc if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Stalwart Mail Server or parsedmarc better?
Neither is universally better. Stalwart Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Stalwart Mail Server and parsedmarc free and open-source?
Yes. Stalwart Mail Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and parsedmarc under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stalwart Mail Server and parsedmarc with Docker?
Stalwart Mail Server: yes. parsedmarc: yes.
Related comparisons
- Stalwart Mail Server vs aerc
- Stalwart Mail Server vs afew
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Afterlogic DAV
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alps
- Stalwart Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs b1gMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs bogofilter
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Claws Mail