AnonAddy vs Stalwart Mail Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AnonAddy
Email forwarding service for creating aliases
VS
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
| Feature | AnonAddy | Stalwart Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,789 | ★ 14,059 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose AnonAddy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Frequently asked questions
Is AnonAddy or Stalwart Mail Server better?
Neither is universally better. Stalwart Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are AnonAddy and Stalwart Mail Server free and open-source?
Yes. AnonAddy is licensed under MIT and Stalwart Mail Server under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AnonAddy and Stalwart Mail Server with Docker?
AnonAddy: yes. Stalwart Mail Server: yes.
Related comparisons
- AnonAddy vs Docker Mailserver
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Docker Mailserver
- AnonAddy vs Haraka
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Haraka
- AnonAddy vs listmonk
- Stalwart Mail Server vs listmonk
- AnonAddy vs Maddy Mail Server
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Maddy Mail Server
- AnonAddy vs Mail-in-a-Box
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Mail-in-a-Box