Apache James vs Stalwart Mail Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache James
Enterprise mail server and SMTP/IMAP platform
VS
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
| Feature | Apache James | Stalwart Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,037 | ★ 14,059 |
| First released | 2003 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache James if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache James or Stalwart Mail Server better?
Stalwart Mail Server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache James if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache James and Stalwart Mail Server free and open-source?
Yes. Apache James is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Stalwart Mail Server under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache James and Stalwart Mail Server with Docker?
Apache James: yes. Stalwart Mail Server: yes.
Related comparisons
- Apache James vs Courier Mail Server
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Courier Mail Server
- Apache James vs Cyrus IMAP
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Cyrus IMAP
- Apache James vs Docker Mailserver
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Docker Mailserver
- Apache James vs Dovecot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Dovecot
- Apache James vs iRedMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs iRedMail