Dovecot vs Stalwart Mail Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dovecot
Secure, high-performance IMAP and POP3 server
VS
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
| Feature | Dovecot | Stalwart Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,233 | ★ 14,059 |
| First released | 2002 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Frequently asked questions
Is Dovecot or Stalwart Mail Server better?
Stalwart Mail Server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Dovecot if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dovecot and Stalwart Mail Server free and open-source?
Yes. Dovecot is licensed under MIT and Stalwart Mail Server under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dovecot and Stalwart Mail Server with Docker?
Dovecot: yes. Stalwart Mail Server: yes.
Related comparisons
- Dovecot vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- Dovecot vs Courier Mail Server
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Courier Mail Server
- Dovecot vs Cyrus IMAP
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Cyrus IMAP
- Dovecot vs Docker Mailserver
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Docker Mailserver
- Dovecot vs iRedMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs iRedMail