Stalwart Mail Server vs Kolab Groupware
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
VS
Kolab Groupware
Open-source groupware server with mail and calendaring
| Feature | Stalwart Mail Server | Kolab Groupware |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,059 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2020 | 2002 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace | Microsoft Exchange, Zimbra |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Choose Kolab Groupware if…
- Built on proven components
- Strong standards support
Frequently asked questions
Is Stalwart Mail Server or Kolab Groupware better?
Stalwart Mail Server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kolab Groupware if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Stalwart Mail Server and Kolab Groupware free and open-source?
Yes. Stalwart Mail Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Kolab Groupware under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stalwart Mail Server and Kolab Groupware with Docker?
Stalwart Mail Server: yes. Kolab Groupware: yes.
Related comparisons
- Stalwart Mail Server vs aerc
- Stalwart Mail Server vs afew
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Afterlogic DAV
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alps
- Stalwart Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- Kolab Groupware vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs b1gMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs bogofilter