Stalwart Mail Server vs Kopano Groupware Core
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
VS
Kopano Groupware Core
Open-source collaboration platform with Outlook support
| Feature | Stalwart Mail Server | Kopano Groupware Core |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,059 | ★ 60 |
| First released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace | Microsoft Exchange |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Choose Kopano Groupware Core if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Stalwart Mail Server or Kopano Groupware Core better?
Stalwart Mail Server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kopano Groupware Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Stalwart Mail Server and Kopano Groupware Core free and open-source?
Yes. Stalwart Mail Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Kopano Groupware Core under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stalwart Mail Server and Kopano Groupware Core with Docker?
Stalwart Mail Server: yes. Kopano Groupware Core: yes.
Related comparisons
- Stalwart Mail Server vs aerc
- Stalwart Mail Server vs afew
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Afterlogic DAV
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alps
- Stalwart Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- Kopano Groupware Core vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs b1gMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs bogofilter