Stalwart Mail Server vs DAViCal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
VS
DAViCal
Server for sharing calendars and address books via DAV
| Feature | Stalwart Mail Server | DAViCal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,059 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2020 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace | Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Choose DAViCal if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Stalwart Mail Server or DAViCal better?
Neither is universally better. Stalwart Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Stalwart Mail Server and DAViCal free and open-source?
Yes. Stalwart Mail Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and DAViCal under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stalwart Mail Server and DAViCal with Docker?
Stalwart Mail Server: yes. DAViCal: yes.
Related comparisons
- Stalwart Mail Server vs aerc
- Stalwart Mail Server vs afew
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Afterlogic DAV
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alps
- Stalwart Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- DAViCal vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs b1gMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs bogofilter