Stalwart Mail Server vs Citadel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
VS
Citadel
All-in-one groupware, mail and collaboration server
| Feature | Stalwart Mail Server | Citadel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,059 | ★ 100 |
| First released | 2020 | 1987 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace | Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft 365 |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Frequently asked questions
Is Stalwart Mail Server or Citadel better?
Neither is universally better. Stalwart Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Stalwart Mail Server and Citadel free and open-source?
Yes. Stalwart Mail Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Citadel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stalwart Mail Server and Citadel with Docker?
Stalwart Mail Server: yes. Citadel: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Stalwart Mail Server vs aerc
- Stalwart Mail Server vs afew
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Afterlogic DAV
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alps
- Stalwart Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- Citadel vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs b1gMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs bogofilter