Stalwart Mail Server vs Sympa
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
VS
Sympa
Scalable mailing list management software
| Feature | Stalwart Mail Server | Sympa |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,059 | ★ 310 |
| First released | 2020 | 1997 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace | Google Groups |
Why pick each one
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Frequently asked questions
Is Stalwart Mail Server or Sympa better?
Stalwart Mail Server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Sympa if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Stalwart Mail Server and Sympa free and open-source?
Yes. Stalwart Mail Server is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sympa under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stalwart Mail Server and Sympa with Docker?
Stalwart Mail Server: yes. Sympa: yes.
Related comparisons
- Stalwart Mail Server vs aerc
- Stalwart Mail Server vs afew
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Afterlogic DAV
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alot
- Stalwart Mail Server vs alps
- Stalwart Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Apache James
- Stalwart Mail Server vs b1gMail
- Stalwart Mail Server vs bogofilter
- Stalwart Mail Server vs Claws Mail