listmonk vs piler
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
listmonk
Self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager
VS
piler
Email archiving system with full-text search
| Feature | listmonk | piler |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,670 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2020 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Mailchimp, Sendinblue | Mimecast, Barracuda Archiver |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is listmonk or piler better?
listmonk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider piler if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are listmonk and piler free and open-source?
Yes. listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and piler under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run listmonk and piler with Docker?
listmonk: yes. piler: check the project docs for container support.