alps vs listmonk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
alps
Simple and extensible web-based email client
VS
listmonk
Self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager
| Feature | alps | listmonk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 22,670 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Gmail | Mailchimp, Sendinblue |
Why pick each one
Choose alps if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is alps or listmonk better?
listmonk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider alps if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are alps and listmonk free and open-source?
Yes. alps is licensed under MIT and listmonk under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run alps and listmonk with Docker?
alps: check the project docs for container support. listmonk: yes.