alps vs Docker Mailserver
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
alps
Simple and extensible web-based email client
VS
Docker Mailserver
Production-ready, config-driven mail server in a container
| Feature | alps | Docker Mailserver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 700 | ★ 18,682 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Gmail | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 |
Why pick each one
Choose alps if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Docker Mailserver if…
- Reproducible, version-controllable config
- Lightweight
Frequently asked questions
Is alps or Docker Mailserver better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Mailserver has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are alps and Docker Mailserver free and open-source?
Yes. alps is licensed under MIT and Docker Mailserver under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run alps and Docker Mailserver with Docker?
alps: check the project docs for container support. Docker Mailserver: yes.