Claws Mail vs listmonk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Claws Mail
Lightweight and fast GTK email client
VS
listmonk
Self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager
| Feature | Claws Mail | listmonk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 22,670 |
| First released | 2001 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Outlook | Mailchimp, Sendinblue |
Why pick each one
Choose Claws Mail if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Claws Mail or listmonk better?
Neither is universally better. listmonk has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Claws Mail and listmonk free and open-source?
Yes. Claws Mail is licensed under GPL-3.0 and listmonk under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Claws Mail and listmonk with Docker?
Claws Mail: check the project docs for container support. listmonk: yes.