ElkarBackup vs UrBackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ElkarBackup
Web-based backup solution built on rsync
VS
UrBackup
Client-server backup for files and disk images
| Feature | ElkarBackup | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 415 | ★ 890 |
| First released | 2014 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Carbonite | Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose UrBackup if…
- Good for backing up many PCs
- Image backup support
- Central management
Frequently asked questions
Is ElkarBackup or UrBackup better?
Neither is universally better. UrBackup has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ElkarBackup and UrBackup free and open-source?
Yes. ElkarBackup is licensed under GPL-3.0 and UrBackup under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ElkarBackup and UrBackup with Docker?
ElkarBackup: yes. UrBackup: yes.