BorgBackup vs UrBackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BorgBackup
Deduplicating archiver with compression and encryption
VS
UrBackup
Client-server backup for files and disk images
| Feature | BorgBackup | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,588 | ★ 890 |
| First released | 2015 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Carbonite, Backblaze | Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose UrBackup if…
- Good for backing up many PCs
- Image backup support
- Central management
Frequently asked questions
Is BorgBackup or UrBackup better?
Neither is universally better. BorgBackup has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are BorgBackup and UrBackup free and open-source?
Yes. BorgBackup is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and UrBackup under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BorgBackup and UrBackup with Docker?
BorgBackup: check the project docs for container support. UrBackup: yes.