ejabberd vs Syphon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ejabberd
Robust, scalable XMPP messaging server
VS
Syphon
Privacy-focused Matrix client built with Flutter
| Feature | ejabberd | Syphon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Erlang | Dart |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,711 | ★ 1,061 |
| First released | 2002 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Slack, WhatsApp | WhatsApp, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Syphon if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Dart
Frequently asked questions
Is ejabberd or Syphon better?
Neither is universally better. ejabberd has the larger community, while Syphon is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ejabberd and Syphon free and open-source?
Yes. ejabberd is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Syphon under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ejabberd and Syphon with Docker?
ejabberd: yes. Syphon: check the project docs for container support.