ejabberd vs Hydrogen
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | ejabberd | Hydrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Erlang | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,711 | ★ 709 |
| First released | 2002 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Slack, WhatsApp | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Hydrogen if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is ejabberd or Hydrogen better?
Neither is universally better. ejabberd has the larger community, while Hydrogen is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ejabberd and Hydrogen free and open-source?
Yes. ejabberd is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Hydrogen under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ejabberd and Hydrogen with Docker?
ejabberd: yes. Hydrogen: check the project docs for container support.