Berty vs ejabberd

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyejabberd
CategoryChat & CommunicationMatrix & XMPP
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptErlang
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 6,711
First released20182002
ReplacesWhatsApp, SignalSlack, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose ejabberd if…

  • Extremely scalable
  • Battle-tested
  • Standards-based
ejabberd details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or ejabberd better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Berty and ejabberd free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ejabberd under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and ejabberd with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. ejabberd: yes.

Related comparisons