ejabberd vs gomuks

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureejabberdgomuks
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score91 · Excellent85 · Excellent
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageErlangGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 6,732★ 1,727
First released20022018
ReplacesSlack, WhatsAppSlack, Discord

What are ejabberd and gomuks?

ejabberd

ejabberd is a robust and scalable XMPP server powering instant messaging, presence, and real-time communication. It targets operators running large messaging deployments. It is deployed via Docker or native packages.

  • Highly scalable XMPP server
  • Clustering support
  • Many extension modules
  • MQTT and SIP support

Read the full ejabberd guide →

gomuks

gomuks is a terminal user interface client for the Matrix protocol. It supports end-to-end encryption and provides a keyboard-driven chat experience for people who prefer the command line.

  • Terminal UI
  • End-to-end encryption
  • Keyboard-driven
  • Single Go binary

ejabberd vs gomuks: key differences

Ejabberd is written in Erlang, while gomuks is built with Go. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for ejabberd versus AGPL-3.0 for gomuks. Gomuks is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for ejabberd. Ejabberd is the more established project (first released 2002), while gomuks arrived in 2018. Ejabberd has the considerably larger community, at 6,732 GitHub stars versus 1,727. Ejabberd lists first-class Docker deployment; gomuks does not.

Why pick each one

Choose ejabberd if…

  • Extremely scalable
  • Battle-tested
  • Standards-based

Watch out for

  • XMPP UX depends on clients
  • Advanced config is complex
ejabberd details

Choose gomuks if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
gomuks details

Frequently asked questions

Is ejabberd or gomuks better?

Neither is universally better. ejabberd has the larger community, while gomuks is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ejabberd and gomuks free and open-source?

Yes. ejabberd is licensed under GPL-2.0 and gomuks under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ejabberd and gomuks with Docker?

ejabberd: yes. gomuks: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, ejabberd or gomuks?

gomuks has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for ejabberd. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons