Restic Exporter vs Kopia
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Restic Exporter
Prometheus exporter for restic repository status
VS
Kopia
Fast, encrypted backup with a clean interface
| Feature | Restic Exporter | Kopia |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 158 | ★ 13,798 |
| First released | 2022 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Datadog | Backblaze, Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose Restic Exporter if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Restic Exporter or Kopia better?
Neither is universally better. Kopia has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Restic Exporter and Kopia free and open-source?
Yes. Restic Exporter is licensed under MIT and Kopia under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Restic Exporter and Kopia with Docker?
Restic Exporter: yes. Kopia: yes.