CKAN vs Restic Exporter
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | CKAN | Restic Exporter |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 158 |
| First released | 2026 | 2022 |
| Replaces | — | Datadog |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Restic Exporter if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or Restic Exporter better?
Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Restic Exporter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CKAN and Restic Exporter free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Restic Exporter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and Restic Exporter with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Restic Exporter: yes.