Duplicati vs Wayback
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
Wayback
A self-hosted toolkit for archiving webpages to the Internet Archive,
| Feature | Duplicati | Wayback |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 2,223 |
| First released | 2008 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Wayback if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or Wayback better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Wayback if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and Wayback free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Wayback under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and Wayback with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. Wayback: check the project docs for container support.