bitmagnet vs Duplicati
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search
VS
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
| Feature | bitmagnet | Duplicati |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,265 | ★ 14,864 |
| First released | 2026 | 2008 |
| Replaces | — | Backblaze, Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose bitmagnet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or Duplicati better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider bitmagnet if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are bitmagnet and Duplicati free and open-source?
Yes. bitmagnet is licensed under MIT and Duplicati under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bitmagnet and Duplicati with Docker?
bitmagnet: yes. Duplicati: yes.