Duplicati vs Stash by AppsCode
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
Stash by AppsCode
Kubernetes backup, restore, and disaster recovery operator
| Feature | Duplicati | Stash by AppsCode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 1,423 |
| First released | 2008 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Kasten K10 |
Why pick each one
Choose Stash by AppsCode if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or Stash by AppsCode better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Stash by AppsCode if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and Stash by AppsCode free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Stash by AppsCode under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and Stash by AppsCode with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. Stash by AppsCode: check the project docs for container support.