Duplicati vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDuplicatiSeaweedFS
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageC#Go
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 14,864★ 33,952
First released20082015
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicati if…

  • Friendly GUI
  • Broad storage support
  • Free
Duplicati details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicati or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Duplicati is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Duplicati and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicati and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Duplicati: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons