Duplicati vs Rustic
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
Rustic
Fast encrypted deduplicated backup compatible with Restic
| Feature | Duplicati | Rustic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C# | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 3,170 |
| First released | 2008 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Rustic if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or Rustic better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Rustic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and Rustic free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Rustic under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and Rustic with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. Rustic: check the project docs for container support.